Accueil
ConnexionNouvelles en langue anglaise
+6
alande
Rumba
Kalawasa
EddieCochran+
Shansaa2
LAWRENCE 45
10 participants
Se connecter pour répondre
InvitéInvité
Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 27 Oct - 4:32
Rappel du premier message :
About 2,800 JFK records released, others withheld (impossibilite de poster le lien pour le moment)
About 2,800 JFK records released, others withheld (impossibilite de poster le lien pour le moment)
hubert.de.boisredon- Messages : 5036
Date d'inscription : 03/01/2019
Localisation : lyon
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 15 Aoû - 19:21
diantre
voilà un commentaire de qualité, mariebé !
j'avoue cependant mon incapacité à traduire "fricosaure", pour moi, c'est du chinois (sans rigoler, hein) !
juste un mot d'un béotien, et donc pas d'un cynique (je suis pas l'héritier d'Antisthène, ni de Diogène de Synope )...
je me souviens de la rétrocession de HK à Pékin, et des commentaires de l'époque, dont le principal, il me semble l'entendre encore, de mémoire : "de toute façon Pékin fera à Hong Kong ce qu'il voudra quand il le voudra !"
sinon, s'il (HK) veut continuer à jouer le développement par l'ouverture, il devra se soumettre aux contraintes extérieures, et ça, c'est pas trop chinois !
et non pas tant celles des droits de l'homme (lol) que celles des règles du jeu inhérentes aux lois du marché !
ce qui compte surtout pour Pékin, c'est de maintenir le concept d'une Chine formant un tout, et donc pas question d'autonomie, même si elle a existé dans un premier temps des arrangements de façade (pratiques ou pragmatiques, même)
c'était d'ailleurs antinomique avec le "communisme de marché" cher au boss pékinois, un vrai chien, celui là (lol)
juste en passant, pour rebondir, et en accord avec ma chère mariebé !
amicalement et aime-hablement
hub'
voilà un commentaire de qualité, mariebé !
j'avoue cependant mon incapacité à traduire "fricosaure", pour moi, c'est du chinois (sans rigoler, hein) !
juste un mot d'un béotien, et donc pas d'un cynique (je suis pas l'héritier d'Antisthène, ni de Diogène de Synope )...
je me souviens de la rétrocession de HK à Pékin, et des commentaires de l'époque, dont le principal, il me semble l'entendre encore, de mémoire : "de toute façon Pékin fera à Hong Kong ce qu'il voudra quand il le voudra !"
sinon, s'il (HK) veut continuer à jouer le développement par l'ouverture, il devra se soumettre aux contraintes extérieures, et ça, c'est pas trop chinois !
et non pas tant celles des droits de l'homme (lol) que celles des règles du jeu inhérentes aux lois du marché !
ce qui compte surtout pour Pékin, c'est de maintenir le concept d'une Chine formant un tout, et donc pas question d'autonomie, même si elle a existé dans un premier temps des arrangements de façade (pratiques ou pragmatiques, même)
c'était d'ailleurs antinomique avec le "communisme de marché" cher au boss pékinois, un vrai chien, celui là (lol)
juste en passant, pour rebondir, et en accord avec ma chère mariebé !
amicalement et aime-hablement
hub'
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 16 Aoû - 13:44
Medicare for All: $33 trillion
Universal Basic Income: $45 trillion
Green New Deal: $12 trillion
Free College: $2 trillion
Liberals faces when they realize that a 100% tax on the “rich” still isn’t enough to fund their socialist utopia: PRICELESS
It Is Arithmetically Impossible to Fund the Progressive Agenda by Taxing the Rich
SUMMARY
It is arithmetically impossible to pay for progressive promises by “taxing the rich.” Progressive promises are too expensive—and the amount of income earned by the rich is too small. Even using lower cost estimates, confiscating every dollar earned by every taxpayer with incomes of $200,000 or more would only pay for about half of the progressive agenda. And that figure is based on the false assumption that people would continue to work, save, and invest when subject to a 100 percent flat tax. The reality is that progressive promises can only be funded by increasing taxes on the middle class from three to 10 times their current level or, for a limited time, by dramatic and unsustainable increases in federal borrowing.
Universal Basic Income: $45 trillion
Green New Deal: $12 trillion
Free College: $2 trillion
Liberals faces when they realize that a 100% tax on the “rich” still isn’t enough to fund their socialist utopia: PRICELESS
It Is Arithmetically Impossible to Fund the Progressive Agenda by Taxing the Rich
SUMMARY
It is arithmetically impossible to pay for progressive promises by “taxing the rich.” Progressive promises are too expensive—and the amount of income earned by the rich is too small. Even using lower cost estimates, confiscating every dollar earned by every taxpayer with incomes of $200,000 or more would only pay for about half of the progressive agenda. And that figure is based on the false assumption that people would continue to work, save, and invest when subject to a 100 percent flat tax. The reality is that progressive promises can only be funded by increasing taxes on the middle class from three to 10 times their current level or, for a limited time, by dramatic and unsustainable increases in federal borrowing.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 16 Aoû - 14:11
alors oui, je ramene encore Obama sur le tapis mais bon...
A l'epoque, la gauche ne voyait aucun probleme, moi si.
De nos jours, la gauche voit un probleme avec ces chiffres, et moi aussi.
A l'epoque, la gauche ne voyait aucun probleme, moi si.
De nos jours, la gauche voit un probleme avec ces chiffres, et moi aussi.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 16 Aoû - 14:27
However:
Who Increased the U.S. Debt the Most? Depends on How You Measure It.
...
Donald Trump: As projected in Table S-10 in the FY 2020 budget, Trump plans to add $5.088 trillion to the debt in his first term. That's a 30 percent increase from the $20.245 trillion debt at the end of Obama's last budget for FY 2017. If he remains in office for a second term, he plans to add $9.1 trillion. Trump had promised to eliminate the debt during his campaign.
Barack Obama: Added $8.588 trillion, a 74 percent increase from the $11.657 trillion debt at the end of Bush’s last budget, FY 2009.
George W. Bush: Added $5.849 trillion, a 101 percent increase from the $5.8 trillion debt at the end of Clinton's last budget, FY 2001.
Bill Clinton: Added $1.396 trillion, a 32 percent increase from the $4.4 trillion debt at the end of George H.W. Bush's last budget, FY 1993.
George H.W. Bush: Added $1.554 trillion, a 54 percent increase from the $2.857 trillion debt at the end of Reagan's last budget, FY 1989.
Ronald Reagan: Added $1.86 trillion, a 186 percent increase from the $998 billion debt at the end of Carter's last budget, FY 1981.
Jimmy Carter: Added $299 billion, a 43 percent increase from the $699 billion debt at the end of Ford's last budget, FY 1977.
Who Increased the U.S. Debt the Most? Depends on How You Measure It.
...
U.S. Debt Increase by Fiscal Year Since 1960
The U.S. Treasury Department has historical tables that report the annual U.S. debt for each fiscal year since 1790. This data has been compiled for each president as detailed below.Donald Trump: As projected in Table S-10 in the FY 2020 budget, Trump plans to add $5.088 trillion to the debt in his first term. That's a 30 percent increase from the $20.245 trillion debt at the end of Obama's last budget for FY 2017. If he remains in office for a second term, he plans to add $9.1 trillion. Trump had promised to eliminate the debt during his campaign.
- FY 2021 - $1.276 trillion.
- FY 2020 - $1.281 trillion.
- FY 2019 - $1.314 trillion.
- FY 2018 - $1.217 trillion.
Barack Obama: Added $8.588 trillion, a 74 percent increase from the $11.657 trillion debt at the end of Bush’s last budget, FY 2009.
- FY 2017 - $672 billion.
- FY 2016 - $1.423 trillion.
- FY 2015 - $327 billion.
- FY 2014 - $1.086 trillion.
- FY 2013 - $672 billion.
- FY 2012 - $1.276 trillion.
- FY 2011 - $1.229 trillion.
- FY 2010 - $1.652 trillion.
- FY 2009 - $253 billion. Congress passed the Economic Stimulus Act, which spent $253 billion in FY 2009. This rare occurrence should be added to President Obama's contribution to the debt.
George W. Bush: Added $5.849 trillion, a 101 percent increase from the $5.8 trillion debt at the end of Clinton's last budget, FY 2001.
- FY 2009 - $1.632 trillion. This was Bush's deficit without the impact of the Economic Stimulus Act.
- FY 2008 - $1.017 trillion.
- FY 2007 - $501 billion.
- FY 2006 - $574 billion.
- FY 2005 - $554 billion.
- FY 2004 - $596 billion.
- FY 2003 - $555 billion.
- FY 2002 - $421 billion.
Bill Clinton: Added $1.396 trillion, a 32 percent increase from the $4.4 trillion debt at the end of George H.W. Bush's last budget, FY 1993.
- FY 2001 - $133 billion.
- FY 2000 - $18 billion.
- FY 1999 - $130 billion.
- FY 1998 - $113 billion.
- FY 1997 - $188 billion.
- FY 1996 - $251 billion.
- FY 1995 - $281 billion.
- FY 1994 - $281 billion.
George H.W. Bush: Added $1.554 trillion, a 54 percent increase from the $2.857 trillion debt at the end of Reagan's last budget, FY 1989.
- FY 1993 - $347 billion.
- FY 1992 - $399 billion.
- FY 1991 - $432 billion.
- FY 1990 - $376 billion.
Ronald Reagan: Added $1.86 trillion, a 186 percent increase from the $998 billion debt at the end of Carter's last budget, FY 1981.
- FY 1989 - $255 billion.
- FY 1988 - $252 billion.
- FY 1987 - $225 billion.
- FY 1986 - $297 billion.
- FY 1985 - $256 billion.
- FY 1984 - $195 billion.
- FY 1983 - $235 billion.
- FY 1982 - $144 billion.
Jimmy Carter: Added $299 billion, a 43 percent increase from the $699 billion debt at the end of Ford's last budget, FY 1977.
- FY 1981 - $90 billion.
- FY 1980 - $81 billion.
- FY 1979 - $55 billion.
- FY 1978 - $73 billion.
- hubert.de.boisredon
- Messages : 5036
Date d'inscription : 03/01/2019
Localisation : lyon
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 16 Aoû - 15:49
damned
what a flurry, I translate difficultly, sorry, Sylvette !
(et donc je réponds pas)
idem lorsque je réponds à ma chère Mariebé, ça ressemble au monologue du vaccin ! (bien lire vaccin)
je fais finir par être vacciné, pour de bon !
vaginalement, pardon, machinalement
hub'
what a flurry, I translate difficultly, sorry, Sylvette !
(et donc je réponds pas)
idem lorsque je réponds à ma chère Mariebé, ça ressemble au monologue du vaccin ! (bien lire vaccin)
je fais finir par être vacciné, pour de bon !
vaginalement, pardon, machinalement
hub'
Shansaa2- Messages : 413
Date d'inscription : 02/11/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 16 Aoû - 17:20
Mab-des-bois a écrit:
Sans cynisme aucun (autre que génétique, veux-je dire), qui a VRAIMENT cru que les Chinois de Chine récupèreraient HK sans y mettre la patte dessus pour de bon, un de ces quatre ? On le disait déjà en 99 !
S'ils interviennent, ils perdent simplement la vitrine fricosaure et la place financière que représente HK, mais ce "simplement" peut suffire à lui garantir les accords de semi-pseudo-indépendance promis par Pékin
Mab
En effet, Personne n'etait dupe Mab, enfin je l'espere. Ce n'etait pas une question de "si"mais de "quand". La Chine a une date butoir le 1er Octobre et ils ne sont pas specialement connus pour aimer perdre la face. Je pense que ca posera plus de problemes politiques qu'economiques. En 1997 le PIB de HK representait 20% de celui de la Chine, aujourd'hui il est tombe a 3% et les Chinois ont rachete plus de 50% de l'immobiliier Hong Kongais.
Comme je le lisais hier : Hong Kong ne represente plus qu'une toute petite partie de l'economie en progression de la Chine continentale.
- Shansaa2
- Messages : 413
Date d'inscription : 02/11/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 16 Aoû - 17:26
SylvetteB a écrit:
It Is Arithmetically Impossible to Fund the Progressive Agenda by Taxing the Rich
Nous allons peut etre etre d'accord, un peu, sur quelque chose.
Comme il est impossible d'ameliorer la vie des classes pauvres et moyennes en faisant des cadeaux d'impots aux 1 ou 2 % qui n'en ont pas vraiment besoin.
Aucune societe delocalisee n'est revenue, au contraire. Et le trickle down economy n'est qu'une autre utopie qui n'a jamais fonctionne.
- Shansaa2
- Messages : 413
Date d'inscription : 02/11/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Sam 17 Aoû - 11:58
SylvetteB a écrit:alors oui, je ramene encore Obama sur le tapis mais bon...
A l'epoque, la gauche ne voyait aucun probleme, moi si.
De nos jours, la gauche voit un probleme avec ces chiffres, et moi aussi.
Moi aussi je vois un probleme avec ces chiffres, decidemment on va peut etre etre d'accord de temps en temps.
Petit commentaire cependant puisque on revoit Obama apparaitre. Je constate que le dette/deficit, n'a fait que baisser sous son administration sauf la derniere annee.
Idem pour les chiffres du chomage dont il a herite, et ou on est passe de 10% a 4.5% (-5.5%). Aujourd'hui on en est a 3.7%. Tant mieux, mais je ne trouve pas que ce dernier chiffre (-0.8%) soit la merveille des merveilles qu'on veut nous faire croire. Alors oui il n'a jamais ete aussi bas, mais il suit une pente descendante qui a commence bien avant Trump. Ce qu'il oublie de mentionner.
M'enfin, pour l'instant il veut acheter le Groenland
et surtout met la faute des mauvais chiffres economiques sur le dos de la presse.When the economy is doing well, it's because of him and when it's not, it is because of someone else?
EddieCochran+- Messages : 7134
Date d'inscription : 15/10/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Dim 25 Aoû - 17:41
608 -
" Reuters
Ruth Bader Ginsburg treated for pancreatic cancer
Lawrence Hurley 1 day ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has completed a three-week course of radiation therapy to treat a cancerous tumor on her pancreas, a court spokeswoman said on Friday.
The 86-year old justice, who has had previous cancer scares, tolerated the therapy well and no further treatment is required, spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said in a statement.
An abnormality was first detected in July, and the tumor was identified following a biopsy performed on July 31 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
"She canceled her annual summer visit to Santa Fe, but has otherwise maintained an active schedule," Arberg said.
"The tumor was treated definitively and there is no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body," the spokeswoman added.
Full screen
1/18 SLIDES :copyright: Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
1935
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was born on March 15, 1933 in Brooklyn, New York to a family of Russian Jewish immigrants.
Pancreatic cancer is one of the hardest cancers to treat and prognoses can be bleak. According to the website of the Columbia Pancreas Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York, the percentage of people still alive five years after a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer that has not spread beyond the pancreas is 27.1%
Ginsburg, who joined the court in 1993, had two cancerous nodules in her left lung removed in December. She was previously treated for pancreatic cancer in 2009 and colon cancer in 1999.
In January, she missed oral arguments for the first time in her lengthy career on the court. As the oldest justice, she is closely watched for any signs of deteriorating health.
Ginsburg, appointed in 1993 by Democratic President Bill Clinton, broke three ribs in a fall in November. The nodules on her lung were found as part of the tests the justice underwent after that fall.
She returned to the bench in February and was an active participant in the remaining oral arguments of the court term, which ended in June. The court is currently in recess until October.
If Ginsburg, one of the nine-member court’s four liberal justices, were unable to continue serving, Republican President Donald Trump could replace her with a conservative, further shifting the court to the right. Trump has added two justices since becoming president in January 2017, cementing its 5-4 conservative majority.
During the second term of Democratic President Barack Obama, Ginsburg rebuffed calls from some liberals that she resign to allow the president to appoint a replacement, thereby avoiding the possibility of a Republican filling her seat.
A cult figure among U.S. liberals, Ginsburg has been dubbed "Notorious RBG" after the late rapper Notorious BIG.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by Andrew Chung; editing by Richard Chang and Jonathan Oatis)""
-------------------------
J'ai comme l'impression que ça doit grenouiller dans les hautes sphères car la question de son remplacement doit être d'actualité...
J'ai une pensée compatissante pour Madame Ginsburg, ce sale crabe qui l'affecte reste une calamité.
" Reuters
Ruth Bader Ginsburg treated for pancreatic cancer
Lawrence Hurley 1 day ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has completed a three-week course of radiation therapy to treat a cancerous tumor on her pancreas, a court spokeswoman said on Friday.
The 86-year old justice, who has had previous cancer scares, tolerated the therapy well and no further treatment is required, spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said in a statement.
An abnormality was first detected in July, and the tumor was identified following a biopsy performed on July 31 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
"She canceled her annual summer visit to Santa Fe, but has otherwise maintained an active schedule," Arberg said.
"The tumor was treated definitively and there is no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body," the spokeswoman added.
Full screen
1/18 SLIDES :copyright: Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
1935
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was born on March 15, 1933 in Brooklyn, New York to a family of Russian Jewish immigrants.
Pancreatic cancer is one of the hardest cancers to treat and prognoses can be bleak. According to the website of the Columbia Pancreas Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York, the percentage of people still alive five years after a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer that has not spread beyond the pancreas is 27.1%
Ginsburg, who joined the court in 1993, had two cancerous nodules in her left lung removed in December. She was previously treated for pancreatic cancer in 2009 and colon cancer in 1999.
In January, she missed oral arguments for the first time in her lengthy career on the court. As the oldest justice, she is closely watched for any signs of deteriorating health.
Ginsburg, appointed in 1993 by Democratic President Bill Clinton, broke three ribs in a fall in November. The nodules on her lung were found as part of the tests the justice underwent after that fall.
She returned to the bench in February and was an active participant in the remaining oral arguments of the court term, which ended in June. The court is currently in recess until October.
If Ginsburg, one of the nine-member court’s four liberal justices, were unable to continue serving, Republican President Donald Trump could replace her with a conservative, further shifting the court to the right. Trump has added two justices since becoming president in January 2017, cementing its 5-4 conservative majority.
During the second term of Democratic President Barack Obama, Ginsburg rebuffed calls from some liberals that she resign to allow the president to appoint a replacement, thereby avoiding the possibility of a Republican filling her seat.
A cult figure among U.S. liberals, Ginsburg has been dubbed "Notorious RBG" after the late rapper Notorious BIG.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by Andrew Chung; editing by Richard Chang and Jonathan Oatis)""
-------------------------
J'ai comme l'impression que ça doit grenouiller dans les hautes sphères car la question de son remplacement doit être d'actualité...
J'ai une pensée compatissante pour Madame Ginsburg, ce sale crabe qui l'affecte reste une calamité.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 28 Aoû - 14:35
Shansaa a ecrit: When the economy is doing well, it's because of him and when it's not, it is because of someone else?
Mais elle marche tres bien l'economie pour le moment (il faut tout-de-meme 2 trimestres negatifs - pas en baisse mais negatifs - pour etre en recession or ce n'est pas le cas) meme si les Democrates tentent de faire croire le contraire creant une atmosphere de ralentissement parmi certains investisseurs..
Je demande simplement, si les resultats economiques etaient ceux d'Obama: serait-il question de recession??
Meme chose en ce qui concerne la politique exterieure: les Democrates* font que l'Iran et la Coree du Nord attendent patiemment le depart de President Trump et que les U.S. retournent a une politique etrangere a la Obama (n'oublions pas l'avion plein de cash en route pour l'Iran et le fait qu'en 2016, nous nous attendions tous a une guerre imminente avec la Coree du Nord.)
* (par la je veux dire les elus et la majorite de la presse, qui n'ont eu de cesse de faire croire que 45 n'etait pas la pour rester, lancant une investigation qui devait prouver qu'il avait eu l'aide russe pour devenir president - pas pour avoir gagne les elections parce qu'a ce jour, ils n'acceptent toujours pas le fait qu'il soit le vainqueur de 2016 mais pour etre l'"occupant du bureau oval") - et repetant pendant presque trois annees maintenant qu'il etait coupable, traitre; et mettant meme en route les rouages d'un impeachment etc..)
Incroyable que le Donald parvienne aux resultats positifs actuels avec une telle opposition et dans un tel climat.
Mais elle marche tres bien l'economie pour le moment (il faut tout-de-meme 2 trimestres negatifs - pas en baisse mais negatifs - pour etre en recession or ce n'est pas le cas) meme si les Democrates tentent de faire croire le contraire creant une atmosphere de ralentissement parmi certains investisseurs..
Je demande simplement, si les resultats economiques etaient ceux d'Obama: serait-il question de recession??
Meme chose en ce qui concerne la politique exterieure: les Democrates* font que l'Iran et la Coree du Nord attendent patiemment le depart de President Trump et que les U.S. retournent a une politique etrangere a la Obama (n'oublions pas l'avion plein de cash en route pour l'Iran et le fait qu'en 2016, nous nous attendions tous a une guerre imminente avec la Coree du Nord.)
* (par la je veux dire les elus et la majorite de la presse, qui n'ont eu de cesse de faire croire que 45 n'etait pas la pour rester, lancant une investigation qui devait prouver qu'il avait eu l'aide russe pour devenir president - pas pour avoir gagne les elections parce qu'a ce jour, ils n'acceptent toujours pas le fait qu'il soit le vainqueur de 2016 mais pour etre l'"occupant du bureau oval") - et repetant pendant presque trois annees maintenant qu'il etait coupable, traitre; et mettant meme en route les rouages d'un impeachment etc..)
Incroyable que le Donald parvienne aux resultats positifs actuels avec une telle opposition et dans un tel climat.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 28 Aoû - 14:46
Eddie, vous avez ecrit: J'ai comme l'impression que ça doit grenouiller dans les hautes sphères car la question de son remplacement doit être d'actualité...
oui mais les elections etant dans juste un peu plus d'un an, meme si Trump presentait un candidat, les Democrates voteraient (si le nom du candidat parvient a ce niveau) contre en force, esperant un nouveau president Democrate; de plus, il existe une loi, non-ecrite ) qui veut que le siege soit laisse vacant la derniere annee d'une presidence.
Si Trump est reelu, alors la, ce sera(it) une autre affaire.
oui mais les elections etant dans juste un peu plus d'un an, meme si Trump presentait un candidat, les Democrates voteraient (si le nom du candidat parvient a ce niveau) contre en force, esperant un nouveau president Democrate; de plus, il existe une loi, non-ecrite
) qui veut que le siege soit laisse vacant la derniere annee d'une presidence.Si Trump est reelu, alors la, ce sera(it) une autre affaire.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 29 Aoû - 5:38
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell apologizes for unverified Trump-Russia report: 'We are retracting the story'
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News
MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell kicked off his show Wednesday night by apologizing for running an unverified report that directly tied President Trump's finances to Russia, which he retracted.
"Last night on this show, I discussed information that wasn't ready for reporting," O'Donnell said. "I repeated statements a single source told me about the president's finances and loan documents with Deutsche Bank saying 'if true'-- as I discussed the information-- was simply not good enough. I did not go through the rigorous verification and standards process here at MSNBC before repeating what I heard from my source. Had it gone through that process, I would not have been permitted to report it. I should not have said it on-air or post it on Twitter. I was wrong to do so."
He went on to acknowledge the letter he and NBCUniversal received by Trump's legal counsel demanding a retraction and an apology for the "aforementioned false and defamatory" reporting and threated to take legal action.
"This afternoon, attorneys for the president sent us a letter asserting the story is false. They also demanded a retraction. Tonight, we are retracting the story," O'Donnell continued. "We don't know whether the information is inaccurate. The fact is we do know it wasn't ready for broadcast and for that I apologize."
On Tuesday night, O’Donnell and fellow far-left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow discussed how Trump was “able to obtain loans when no one else would loan him any money” when he tossed out the unverified speculation.
“I may have some information, in this next hour, which would add a great deal to their understanding of that, if true, and I’ll be discussing it here,” O’Donnell said. "I stress ‘if true,’ because this is a single source who has told me that Deutsche Bank obtained tax returns… this single source close to Deutsche Bank has told me that Donald Trump’s loan documents there show that he has co-signers. That’s how he was able to obtain those loans and that the co-signers are Russian oligarchs."
A stunned Maddow leaned back in her chair and responded, “What? Really?”
O’Donnell added “that would explain every kind word Donald Trump has ever said about Russia and Vladimir Putin” if his information is accurate.
The "Last Word" host and MSNBC were widely panned by critics for running the story, calling it "grossly irresponsible." The White House blasted the report, pointing to "left-wing outlets" that have "weaponized the media.
“This is one of the reasons that a majority of Americans have lost trust in the media. Instead of applying ethics and standards to their reporting, journalists and left-wing outlets have weaponized the media, using it to attack and harass people with little to no regard for the truth,” White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham told Fox News.
O'Donnell took to Twitter earlier in the day and walked back the report, referring to it as an "error in judgment."
Fox News' Brian Flood contributed to this report.
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News
MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell kicked off his show Wednesday night by apologizing for running an unverified report that directly tied President Trump's finances to Russia, which he retracted.
"Last night on this show, I discussed information that wasn't ready for reporting," O'Donnell said. "I repeated statements a single source told me about the president's finances and loan documents with Deutsche Bank saying 'if true'-- as I discussed the information-- was simply not good enough. I did not go through the rigorous verification and standards process here at MSNBC before repeating what I heard from my source. Had it gone through that process, I would not have been permitted to report it. I should not have said it on-air or post it on Twitter. I was wrong to do so."
He went on to acknowledge the letter he and NBCUniversal received by Trump's legal counsel demanding a retraction and an apology for the "aforementioned false and defamatory" reporting and threated to take legal action.
"This afternoon, attorneys for the president sent us a letter asserting the story is false. They also demanded a retraction. Tonight, we are retracting the story," O'Donnell continued. "We don't know whether the information is inaccurate. The fact is we do know it wasn't ready for broadcast and for that I apologize."
On Tuesday night, O’Donnell and fellow far-left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow discussed how Trump was “able to obtain loans when no one else would loan him any money” when he tossed out the unverified speculation.
“I may have some information, in this next hour, which would add a great deal to their understanding of that, if true, and I’ll be discussing it here,” O’Donnell said. "I stress ‘if true,’ because this is a single source who has told me that Deutsche Bank obtained tax returns… this single source close to Deutsche Bank has told me that Donald Trump’s loan documents there show that he has co-signers. That’s how he was able to obtain those loans and that the co-signers are Russian oligarchs."
A stunned Maddow leaned back in her chair and responded, “What? Really?”
O’Donnell added “that would explain every kind word Donald Trump has ever said about Russia and Vladimir Putin” if his information is accurate.
The "Last Word" host and MSNBC were widely panned by critics for running the story, calling it "grossly irresponsible." The White House blasted the report, pointing to "left-wing outlets" that have "weaponized the media.
“This is one of the reasons that a majority of Americans have lost trust in the media. Instead of applying ethics and standards to their reporting, journalists and left-wing outlets have weaponized the media, using it to attack and harass people with little to no regard for the truth,” White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham told Fox News.
O'Donnell took to Twitter earlier in the day and walked back the report, referring to it as an "error in judgment."
Fox News' Brian Flood contributed to this report.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 29 Aoû - 5:43
Suis-je la seule a avoir des problemes de formatage et d'edition?
Rumba- Messages : 3135
Date d'inscription : 28/10/2017
Localisation : ça dépend :)
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 29 Aoû - 6:56
ah ? apparemment de mon côté tout fonctionne bien ....................... pour une fois alors je roule des mécaniques
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 29 Aoû - 13:35
ok (Windows m'a impose une mise-a-jour hier, ca a peut-etre a voir avec... 
)- Shansaa2
- Messages : 413
Date d'inscription : 02/11/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 30 Aoû - 17:13
SylvetteB a écrit:Shansaa a ecrit: When the economy is doing well, it's because of him and when it's not, it is because of someone else?
Mais elle marche tres bien l'economie pour le moment (il faut tout-de-meme 2 trimestres negatifs - pas en baisse mais negatifs - pour etre en recession or ce n'est pas le cas) meme si les Democrates tentent de faire croire le contraire creant une atmosphere de ralentissement parmi certains investisseurs..
Je demande simplement, si les resultats economiques etaient ceux d'Obama: serait-il question de recession??
Meme chose en ce qui concerne la politique exterieure: les Democrates* font que l'Iran et la Coree du Nord attendent patiemment le depart de President Trump et que les U.S. retournent a une politique etrangere a la Obama (n'oublions pas l'avion plein de cash en route pour l'Iran et le fait qu'en 2016, nous nous attendions tous a une guerre imminente avec la Coree du Nord.)
* (par la je veux dire les elus et la majorite de la presse, qui n'ont eu de cesse de faire croire que 45 n'etait pas la pour rester, lancant une investigation qui devait prouver qu'il avait eu l'aide russe pour devenir president - pas pour avoir gagne les elections parce qu'a ce jour, ils n'acceptent toujours pas le fait qu'il soit le vainqueur de 2016 mais pour etre l'"occupant du bureau oval") - et repetant pendant presque trois annees maintenant qu'il etait coupable, traitre; et mettant meme en route les rouages d'un impeachment etc..)
Incroyable que le Donald parvienne aux resultats positifs actuels avec une telle opposition et dans un tel climat.
Peut etre moins accorder d'importance au mot lui meme qu'a l'idee generale d'un post. Je n'ai pas parle de recession, mais du fait que quand les choses vont bien, c'est grace a...et si ca va moins bien c'est a cause de...
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
C'est "moins bien" si vous preferez cette description.
Pour l'instant par contre je souris car Fox va peut etre tomber du cote des Fake news eux aussi...
“Just watched Fox News heavily promoting the Democrats through their DNC Communications Director, spewing out whatever she wanted with zero pushback by anchor, Sandra Smith. The New Fox News is letting millions of GREAT people down! We have to start looking for a new News Outlet. Fox isn’t working for us any more!”
Reponse de Neil Cavuto, presentateur chez Fox.
But the president making clear to fact-check him is to be all but dead to him and his legion of supporters who let me know in no uncertain terms I am either with him totally or I am a Never-Trumper bully. There are no grays. No middle grounds. You are either all in or you’re just out. Loyal on everything or not to be trusted on anything.
First of all, Mr. President, we don’t work for you. I don’t work for you. My job is to cover you, not fawn over you or rip you, just cover you — call balls and strikes. Our job is to keep score, not settle scores. In my case, to report the economic numbers when they’re good and when they’re bad, both when the markets are soaring and when they’re tumbling, when trade talks are looking like they’re coming together and when they are looking like falling apart. It’s called being fair and balanced, Mr. President.
You’re entitled to your point of view, Mr. President. But you’re not entitled to your own set of facts.
- EddieCochran+
- Messages : 7134
Date d'inscription : 15/10/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 30 Aoû - 20:14
616 -
Bonjour Chère Shansaa.
J'aime beaucoup l'éspression : millions of GREAT people ? Si ça se trouve ils sont au moins aussi rusés qu'un fox...
L'on dirait que le Fox is out of the box dans laquelle le Mister President l'avait rangé!
Bonjour Chère Shansaa.
J'aime beaucoup l'éspression : millions of GREAT people ? Si ça se trouve ils sont au moins aussi rusés qu'un fox...
L'on dirait que le Fox is out of the box dans laquelle le Mister President l'avait rangé!
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 11 Sep - 15:02
Shansaa, Ah je n'avais pas vu.. un peu occupee C'est amusant comme nous remarquons les memes choses, inversement, si j'ose dire.
J'aime beaucoup Neil Cavuto, c'est quelqu'un de competent, de courageux, qui se conduit de facon toujours professionnelle, qui a beaucoup d'humour et de compassion.
je suis rarement en desaccord avec lui.
En ce qui concerne 45 ce n'est pas nouveau qu'il trouve Fox biaise, il s'en est meme deja pris a Maria Bartiromo.. mais bon, 45 c'est 45..
=====
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESPublished 12 hours agoLast Update 3 hours ago Dems admit Trump helped GOP candidates sweep North Carolina special elections
By Gregg Re | Fox News
In a major victory for both President Trump and national Republicans, North Carolina GOP state Sen. Dan Bishop was projected to win a fiercely contested special U.S. House election for the 9th District that was widely seen as a bellwether for the president's chances in the 2020 election.
And another Republican House candidate, Greg Murphy, decisively won a separate special election in North Carolina's more solidly GOP-leaning 3rd District earlier Tuesday evening — frustrating Democrats who spent millions trying to make a splash in the state.
Even Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) Chairwoman Cheri Bustos acknowledged that the president contributed to Bishop's win, writing in a statement, "We fell an inch short tonight, but it took more than $6 million in outside Republican spending and a last-minute Trump rally" to seal Democratic candidate Dan McCready's fate in the 9th District.
McCready's campaign spent approximately $4.7 million on the race, while Bishop's spent only $1.9 million. Outside spending primarily from national party committees helped Bishop to the tune of $5.8 million, though, compared to McCready's roughly $1.4 million.
The clean sweep heartened the president, who has long emphasized the national implications at stake. Trump unloaded on McCready in the fiery rally on Monday night, telling attendees that "to stop the far-left, you must vote in tomorrow's special election."
That effort, Trump said late Tuesday, had clearly paid dividends.
"Dan Bishop was down 17 points 3 weeks ago," Trump wrote on Twitter. "He then asked me for help, we changed his strategy together, and he ran a great race. Big Rally last night. Now it looks like he is going to win. @CNN &@MSNBC are moving their big studio equipment and talent out. Stay tuned!"
He added: "BIG NIGHT FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL!"
...
La campagne de Bishop a dure 6 mois, celle de son opposant 2 ans.
Nous verrons ce qu'il en est reellement dans un peu moins de 14 mois.
(En passant, selon Gallup, Trump n'a une cote d'approbation que de 39%; en aout 2011, Obama avait 41%.)
C'est amusant comme nous remarquons les memes choses, inversement, si j'ose dire. J'aime beaucoup Neil Cavuto, c'est quelqu'un de competent, de courageux, qui se conduit de facon toujours professionnelle, qui a beaucoup d'humour et de compassion.
je suis rarement en desaccord avec lui.
En ce qui concerne 45
ce n'est pas nouveau qu'il trouve Fox biaise, il s'en est meme deja pris a Maria Bartiromo.. mais bon, 45 c'est 45.. =====
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESPublished 12 hours agoLast Update 3 hours ago Dems admit Trump helped GOP candidates sweep North Carolina special elections
By Gregg Re | Fox News
In a major victory for both President Trump and national Republicans, North Carolina GOP state Sen. Dan Bishop was projected to win a fiercely contested special U.S. House election for the 9th District that was widely seen as a bellwether for the president's chances in the 2020 election.
And another Republican House candidate, Greg Murphy, decisively won a separate special election in North Carolina's more solidly GOP-leaning 3rd District earlier Tuesday evening — frustrating Democrats who spent millions trying to make a splash in the state.
Even Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) Chairwoman Cheri Bustos acknowledged that the president contributed to Bishop's win, writing in a statement, "We fell an inch short tonight, but it took more than $6 million in outside Republican spending and a last-minute Trump rally" to seal Democratic candidate Dan McCready's fate in the 9th District.
McCready's campaign spent approximately $4.7 million on the race, while Bishop's spent only $1.9 million. Outside spending primarily from national party committees helped Bishop to the tune of $5.8 million, though, compared to McCready's roughly $1.4 million.
The clean sweep heartened the president, who has long emphasized the national implications at stake. Trump unloaded on McCready in the fiery rally on Monday night, telling attendees that "to stop the far-left, you must vote in tomorrow's special election."
That effort, Trump said late Tuesday, had clearly paid dividends.
"Dan Bishop was down 17 points 3 weeks ago," Trump wrote on Twitter. "He then asked me for help, we changed his strategy together, and he ran a great race. Big Rally last night. Now it looks like he is going to win. @CNN &@MSNBC are moving their big studio equipment and talent out. Stay tuned!"
He added: "BIG NIGHT FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL!"
...
La campagne de Bishop a dure 6 mois, celle de son opposant 2 ans.
Nous verrons ce qu'il en est reellement dans un peu moins de 14 mois.
(En passant, selon Gallup, Trump n'a une cote d'approbation que de 39%; en aout 2011, Obama avait 41%.)
Younes Terre- Messages : 4510
Date d'inscription : 07/04/2018
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 11 Sep - 18:01
What If We Stopped Pretending?
The climate apocalypse is coming. To prepare for it, we need to admit that we can’t prevent it.
By Jonathan Franzen September 8, 2019
here is infinite hope,” Kafka tells us, “only not for us.” This is a fittingly mystical epigram from a writer whose characters strive for ostensibly reachable goals and, tragically or amusingly, never manage to get any closer to them. But it seems to me, in our rapidly darkening world, that the converse of Kafka’s quip is equally true: There is no hope, except for us.
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
- EddieCochran+
- Messages : 7134
Date d'inscription : 15/10/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 12 Sep - 19:48
620 -
God bless America, en attendant le 11 septembre 2001 c'est le muslims's God qui blesse l'Amérique...
God bless America, en attendant le 11 septembre 2001 c'est le muslims's God qui blesse l'Amérique...
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 13 Sep - 10:17
Eddie, je ne sais pas si c'etait le muslims' God ce jour-la, mais pour sur, c'etait des muslims.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 13 Sep - 10:35
Les 3 tetes de liste democrate hier soir... et ils se moquent de 45..
- Rumba
- Messages : 3135
Date d'inscription : 28/10/2017
Localisation : ça dépend :)
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 13 Sep - 10:43
ils se moquent de 45 ? d'après ce que j'ai lu, Biden n'a pas vraiment été à la hauteur vrai ??
il aurait parlé plus du passé que de l'avenir vrai ???
il aurait parlé plus du passé que de l'avenir vrai ???
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 13 Sep - 11:03
Rumba: je n'ai pas regarde. Voila, je l'ai dit.
D'apres les analyses des experts ici, Biden s'en est assez bien sorti, en tout cas mieux que precedemment, ce qui ne mettait pas la barre tres haut. Quant a Sanders et Warren*, pas d'eclat particulier.
* surnommee Pocahontas par le Donald pour avoir fait croire qu'elle avait des racines amerindiennes.. et d'avoir profite d'avantages offerts aux minorites tout au cours de ses etudes et meme de sa vie professionnelle. Depuis, elle n'a de cesse de presenter ses excuses a qui veut bien l'entendre. Mais bon, elle est tout-de-meme en 3eme position pour le moment
D'apres les analyses des experts ici, Biden s'en est assez bien sorti, en tout cas mieux que precedemment, ce qui ne mettait pas la barre tres haut. Quant a Sanders et Warren*, pas d'eclat particulier.
* surnommee Pocahontas par le Donald pour avoir fait croire qu'elle avait des racines amerindiennes.. et d'avoir profite d'avantages offerts aux minorites tout au cours de ses etudes et meme de sa vie professionnelle.
Depuis, elle n'a de cesse de presenter ses excuses a qui veut bien l'entendre. Mais bon, elle est tout-de-meme en 3eme position pour le moment Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum|
|
|