Accueil
ConnexionNouvelles en langue anglaise
+6
alande
Rumba
Kalawasa
EddieCochran+
Shansaa2
LAWRENCE 45
10 participants
Se connecter pour répondre
InvitéInvité
Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 27 Oct - 4:32
Rappel du premier message :
About 2,800 JFK records released, others withheld (impossibilite de poster le lien pour le moment)
About 2,800 JFK records released, others withheld (impossibilite de poster le lien pour le moment)
- EddieCochran+
- Messages : 7134
Date d'inscription : 15/10/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 11 Déc - 20:22
774 -
Pour le fun des passagers d'Hères-du-Temps voici kelkes ésplications sur l'affaire du Lolita Espress très prudes pour ne pas contaminer notre plus jeune public:
"Flight Logs Put Clinton, Dershowitz on Pedophile Billionaire’s Sex Jet
Nick Bryant 01/22/15 02:55PM
Bill Clinton took repeated trips on the " Lolita Express"—the private passenger jet owned by billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein—with an actress in softcore porn movies whose name appears in Epstein's address book under an entry for "massages," according to flight logbooks obtained by Gawker and published today for the first time. The logs also show that Clinton shared more than a dozen flights with a woman who federal prosecutors believe procured underage girls to sexually service Epstein and his friends and acted as a "potential co-conspirator" in his crimes.
La suite est lisible : >ICI<
"
Pour le fun des passagers d'Hères-du-Temps voici kelkes ésplications sur l'affaire du Lolita Espress très prudes pour ne pas contaminer notre plus jeune public:
"Flight Logs Put Clinton, Dershowitz on Pedophile Billionaire’s Sex Jet
Nick Bryant 01/22/15 02:55PM
Bill Clinton took repeated trips on the " Lolita Express"—the private passenger jet owned by billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein—with an actress in softcore porn movies whose name appears in Epstein's address book under an entry for "massages," according to flight logbooks obtained by Gawker and published today for the first time. The logs also show that Clinton shared more than a dozen flights with a woman who federal prosecutors believe procured underage girls to sexually service Epstein and his friends and acted as a "potential co-conspirator" in his crimes.
La suite est lisible : >ICI<
"
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 11 Déc - 20:55
La famille royale a mis un de ses princes au ban, mais ici tout baigne pour Bill, pour le moment du moins. (au fait selon un co-pilote, ce serait plutot 26 fois apres avoir fait faux bond a ses gardes-du-corps..)
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 12 Déc - 5:26
We Just Got a Rare Look at National Security Surveillance. It Was Ugly.
A high-profile inspector general report has served as fodder for arguments about President Trump. But its findings about surveillance are important beyond partisan politics.
By Charlie Savage
WASHINGTON — When a long-awaited inspector general report about the F.B.I.’s Russia investigation became public this week, partisans across the political spectrum mined it to argue about whether President Trump falsely smeared the F.B.I. or was its victim. But the report was also important for reasons that had nothing to do with Mr. Trump.
At more than 400 pages, the study amounted to the most searching look ever at the government’s secretive system for carrying out national-security surveillance on American soil. And what the report showed was not pretty.
The Justice Department’s independent inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, and his team uncovered a staggeringly dysfunctional and error-ridden process in how the F.B.I. went about obtaining and renewing court permission under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, to wiretap Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser.
...
The report should call into question the legitimacy of the FISA system “whether you like Trump, hate Trump, don’t care about Trump,” Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said at the hearing on Wednesday.
“I’d hate to lose the ability of the FISA court to operate at a time probably when we need it the most,” Mr. Graham told Mr. Horowitz. “But after your report, I have serious concerns about whether the FISA court can continue unless there’s fundamental reform.”
A high-profile inspector general report has served as fodder for arguments about President Trump. But its findings about surveillance are important beyond partisan politics.
By Charlie Savage WASHINGTON — When a long-awaited inspector general report about the F.B.I.’s Russia investigation became public this week, partisans across the political spectrum mined it to argue about whether President Trump falsely smeared the F.B.I. or was its victim. But the report was also important for reasons that had nothing to do with Mr. Trump.
At more than 400 pages, the study amounted to the most searching look ever at the government’s secretive system for carrying out national-security surveillance on American soil. And what the report showed was not pretty.
The Justice Department’s independent inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, and his team uncovered a staggeringly dysfunctional and error-ridden process in how the F.B.I. went about obtaining and renewing court permission under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, to wiretap Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser.
...
The report should call into question the legitimacy of the FISA system “whether you like Trump, hate Trump, don’t care about Trump,” Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said at the hearing on Wednesday.
“I’d hate to lose the ability of the FISA court to operate at a time probably when we need it the most,” Mr. Graham told Mr. Horowitz. “But after your report, I have serious concerns about whether the FISA court can continue unless there’s fundamental reform.”
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 12 Déc - 5:36
IG Horowitz: Report doesn't vindicate 'anyone who touched' Trump probe at FBI
By Jeff Mordock - The Washington Times - Wednesday, December 11, 2019
The Justice Department’s inspector general warned Wednesday that his report does not vindicate the FBI’s actions in the investigation of 2016 Trump campaign collusion with Russia.
In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Inspector General Michael Horowitz laid out the FBI’s missteps, blaming the bungled investigation on failures by the bureau’s “entire chain of command.”
His testimony presented an image of an FBI single-mindedly pursuing a nefarious link between then-candidate Donald Trump and the Kremlin, but he stopped short of impugning the motives of FBI top brass who repeatedly erred in favor of surveilling the campaign in what was dubbed “Operation Crossfire Hurricane.”
“The activities we found don’t vindicate anyone who touched this,” Mr. Horowitz said. “The actions of FBI agents were not up to the standard of the FBI.”
Mr. Horowitz appeared before the panel to discuss his 434-page report, released Monday, that concluded the FBI was right to open an investigation into the Trump campaign but committed “inexplicable” errors, omissions and mistakes in applying to the FISA court for a wiretap on Mr. Page.
FBI officials suspected Mr. Page, a confidential CIA source, was a Russian agent. He has never been charged with wrongdoing.
Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, said the irregularities amounted to “a massive criminal conspiracy” to defraud the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and illegally surveil Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page.
====
J'ai sans doute mal cherche, mais je n'ai trouve aucune reference a ce sujet sur les pages francaises.
Se pourrait-il que ca n'aille pas suffisamment dans le sens espere des media francais?
En revanche, on peut trouver les dernieres nouvelles concernant la mise-en-place du show/destitution de 45!
By Jeff Mordock - The Washington Times - Wednesday, December 11, 2019
The Justice Department’s inspector general warned Wednesday that his report does not vindicate the FBI’s actions in the investigation of 2016 Trump campaign collusion with Russia.
In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Inspector General Michael Horowitz laid out the FBI’s missteps, blaming the bungled investigation on failures by the bureau’s “entire chain of command.”
His testimony presented an image of an FBI single-mindedly pursuing a nefarious link between then-candidate Donald Trump and the Kremlin, but he stopped short of impugning the motives of FBI top brass who repeatedly erred in favor of surveilling the campaign in what was dubbed “Operation Crossfire Hurricane.”
“The activities we found don’t vindicate anyone who touched this,” Mr. Horowitz said. “The actions of FBI agents were not up to the standard of the FBI.”
Mr. Horowitz appeared before the panel to discuss his 434-page report, released Monday, that concluded the FBI was right to open an investigation into the Trump campaign but committed “inexplicable” errors, omissions and mistakes in applying to the FISA court for a wiretap on Mr. Page.
FBI officials suspected Mr. Page, a confidential CIA source, was a Russian agent. He has never been charged with wrongdoing.
Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, said the irregularities amounted to “a massive criminal conspiracy” to defraud the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and illegally surveil Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page.
====
J'ai sans doute mal cherche, mais je n'ai trouve aucune reference a ce sujet sur les pages francaises.
Se pourrait-il que ca n'aille pas suffisamment dans le sens espere des media francais?En revanche, on peut trouver les dernieres nouvelles concernant la mise-en-place du show/destitution de 45!
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 12 Déc - 21:36
Si ce n'etait pas si triste on pourrait en rire.. juste pour confirmer, la destitution d'un president est un acte purement politique (le but etant de l'oter de la Maison Blanche). Je ne veux pas vendre la peau de l'ours avant etc.. mais si tout se passe comme prevu, 45 sera "impeached" a l'Assemblee mais pas au Senat (il faut 2/3 des votes). Si les Republicains n'avaient pas garde la majorite au Senat en 2018, le futur politique du Donald serait plus que sombre.. Rien a voir avec sa culpabilite d'ailleurs ou avec son manque, puisqu'aucune preuve de criminalite ou de malfaisance n'ayant ete apportee, ce qui avait ete promis par le leadership Democrate. Cet ete, Nancy avait dit qu'une destitution non-bipartisane n'aurait aucune valeur. Guess what! et pourtant, les Democrates n'ont plus le choix, ils sont obliges de terminer cette desastreuse affaire.
Chris Wallace, pas vraiment un homme de droite et encore moins un supporter de 45 (et oui, meme sur Fox News), commence lui aussi a change de ritournelle.
Chris Wallace: Democrat impeachment support dwindling
Chris Wallace, pas vraiment un homme de droite et encore moins un supporter de 45 (et oui, meme sur Fox News), commence lui aussi a change de ritournelle.
Chris Wallace: Democrat impeachment support dwindling
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Jeu 12 Déc - 23:57
... et pendant ce temps-la..
US, China reach phase one trade deal, source says
US, China reach phase one trade deal, source says
Younes Terre- Messages : 4510
Date d'inscription : 07/04/2018
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 13 Déc - 19:32
EddieCochran+- Messages : 7134
Date d'inscription : 15/10/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Ven 13 Déc - 20:21
681 -
What's up Doc ?
What's up Doc ?
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Dim 15 Déc - 3:07
Ben vrai, ca y est, il gele en enfer!! 
CNN admits Trump correct, that 2 Democrats misquoted Ukraine call during impeachment markup session
By Danielle Wallace | Fox News
CNN sided with President Trump this week, agreeing in a fact check that two House Democrats, both from Texas, had misquoted the president's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky during a House Judiciary Committee impeachment markup session.
In a Twitter message Thursday, Trump wrote that Reps. Veronica Escobar, who represents El Paso, and Sheila Jackson Lee, who represents Houston, “purposely misquoted my call.”
“I said I want you to do us (our Country!) a favor, not me a favor. They know that but decided to LIE in order to make a fraudulent point! Very sad,” the president wrote.
In the declassified transcript of the call, Trump tells Zelensky, “I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot.”
CNN Politics’ Fact Check pointed out that Escobar and Jackson Lee either changed or omitted the word “us” when quoting the transcript in the markup session. The word “us” is significant because it implies Trump was asking for a favor of national interest, instead of a personal favor against a political rival.
Escobar claimed Trump said: “I want you to do me a favor though.”
Jackson Lee misquoted the call in the markup session, saying Trump told Zelensky: “I would like you to do a favor though.”
House Democrats announced earlier in the week they were filing two articles of impeachment against Trump, accusing him of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The abuse-of-power charge accuses Trump of using his presidential authority to urge Ukraine to launch an investigation into Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, under a quid pro quo agreement, effectively withholding military aid as leverage.
...
Like Trump, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, also pointed out that Escobar and Jackson Lee did not use the word “us” and, therefore, misquoted the transcript of the call.
Escobar responded to Trump’s tweet, first addressing him with the Russian greeting “Приве́т.”
Stanford Law School professor Pamela Karlan, who was one of three Democrat-called legal experts to testify before the House Judiciary Committee last week, claimed Trump was using what she called “the royal we” on the call with Zelensky.
"When the President said 'do us a favor,' he was using the royal we there," she said. "It wasn't a favor for the United States. He should have said do me a favor because only kings say 'us' when they mean 'me'."
During the hearing, Karlan also drew ire from the White House, the Trump campaign and even first lady Melania Trump after using 13-year-old Barron Trump’s name to illustrate her point that President Trump can’t rule like a king. George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley was the fourth witness in that hearing and the sole expert called by the GOP.
Les 3 temoins experts appeles par la gauche n'ont fait que donner leur sentiment concernant cette conversation, rien de concret, rien de precis.
Leur haine de Trump est sans borne. Qu'est-ce-que quelques petits mensonges ici et la!
CNN admits Trump correct, that 2 Democrats misquoted Ukraine call during impeachment markup session
By Danielle Wallace | Fox NewsCNN sided with President Trump this week, agreeing in a fact check that two House Democrats, both from Texas, had misquoted the president's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky during a House Judiciary Committee impeachment markup session.
In a Twitter message Thursday, Trump wrote that Reps. Veronica Escobar, who represents El Paso, and Sheila Jackson Lee, who represents Houston, “purposely misquoted my call.”
“I said I want you to do us (our Country!) a favor, not me a favor. They know that but decided to LIE in order to make a fraudulent point! Very sad,” the president wrote.
In the declassified transcript of the call, Trump tells Zelensky, “I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot.”
CNN Politics’ Fact Check pointed out that Escobar and Jackson Lee either changed or omitted the word “us” when quoting the transcript in the markup session. The word “us” is significant because it implies Trump was asking for a favor of national interest, instead of a personal favor against a political rival.
Escobar claimed Trump said: “I want you to do me a favor though.”
Jackson Lee misquoted the call in the markup session, saying Trump told Zelensky: “I would like you to do a favor though.”
House Democrats announced earlier in the week they were filing two articles of impeachment against Trump, accusing him of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The abuse-of-power charge accuses Trump of using his presidential authority to urge Ukraine to launch an investigation into Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, under a quid pro quo agreement, effectively withholding military aid as leverage.
...
Like Trump, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, also pointed out that Escobar and Jackson Lee did not use the word “us” and, therefore, misquoted the transcript of the call.
Escobar responded to Trump’s tweet, first addressing him with the Russian greeting “Приве́т.”
Stanford Law School professor Pamela Karlan, who was one of three Democrat-called legal experts to testify before the House Judiciary Committee last week, claimed Trump was using what she called “the royal we” on the call with Zelensky.
"When the President said 'do us a favor,' he was using the royal we there," she said. "It wasn't a favor for the United States. He should have said do me a favor because only kings say 'us' when they mean 'me'."
During the hearing, Karlan also drew ire from the White House, the Trump campaign and even first lady Melania Trump after using 13-year-old Barron Trump’s name to illustrate her point that President Trump can’t rule like a king. George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley was the fourth witness in that hearing and the sole expert called by the GOP.
Les 3 temoins experts appeles par la gauche n'ont fait que donner leur sentiment concernant cette conversation, rien de concret, rien de precis.
Leur haine de Trump est sans borne. Qu'est-ce-que quelques petits mensonges ici et la!
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Dim 15 Déc - 3:47
Anti-impeachment Democrat Jeff Van Drew meets with Trump to discuss party switch
By Adam Shaw, Mark Meredith | Fox News
Rep. Jeff Van Drew, D-N.J., met with President Trump on Friday to discuss going across party lines and joining the Republican Party -- this after he has spent months criticizing fellow Democrats for their push to impeach Trump.
A source confirmed to Fox News on Saturday that Van Drew met with Trump to discuss switching parties.
Another source told Fox News that Van Drew may be seeking a Rose Garden ceremony if he were to switch. Van Drew is one of two Democrats who opposed the resolution codifying the impeachment probe. In addition, Van Drew indicated last week he would not support impeachment and thought impeachment would backfire on Democrats.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, called the party switch "cynical and desperate."
"Jeff Van Drew has chosen his political career over our Constitution," Murphy said in a statement Friday night. "Despite knowing full well that the president has abused the powers of his office, Congressman Van Drew is now willing to enable Donald Trump just to try to salvage his own election."
He added: "Betraying our values by siding with Donald Trump is the final straw and made it impossible for him to continue being supported by our party, as grassroots activists, local party leaders in his district, and I have made clear in recent weeks."
The Washington Post first reported that Trump had personally urged Van Drew to jump ship and that the lawmaker strongly considering it. The New York Times reported that he could make an announcement as soon as next week, just as the House gears up to vote on impeachment.
A spokesperson for Van Drew did not immediately return a request for comment. Two Democratic aides told Fox News that they expected Van Drew to switch parties.
While Van Drew has called President Trump’s conduct in relation to his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky “unsavory,” he has repeatedly said he did not see evidence that would justify his removal from office. He was one of just two House Democrats to oppose the House’s November vote to set impeachment rules.
In an interview with Fox Business last month, he said he would vote against articles of impeachment unless he hears evidence against President Trump that "rises to the level of treason or a high crime."
He said the "Founding Fathers had vigorous debates of whether they would even allow impeachment in the Constitution," and that he favors allowing voters to decide the matter in next year's election.
"You don't disenfranchise voters, millions upon millions of voters. Voters choose their leaders in America," Van Drew had said.
The Times reported that during conversations between Van Drew and Trump advisers, where the freshman congressman said he was nervous about losing his seat either in a Democratic primary -- due to his opposition to impeachment in a liberal state -- or in a general election. A Democratic aide told Fox News that a recent poll his campaign took showed another Democrat would beat him in a primary race.
The Times reported that while Van Drew has not yet made a final decision, he was serious enough that he discussed what day to make an announcement and whether to do it before the upcoming vote on articles of impeachment.
The meeting came the same day that the House Judiciary Committee voted to adopt two articles of impeachment in a party-line vote. The article allege abuse of power and obstruction by Trump. Should the House adopt the articles next week, it could trigger a Senate trial in the new year just as 2020 presidential primaries are about to get underway.
"Today is a solemn and sad day,"* Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., told reporters after the vote. "For the third time in a little over a century and a half, the House Judiciary Committee has voted articles of impeachment against the president -- for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The House will act expeditiously."
*
Nancy confirmait recemment ce que tout Americain qui suit ce qui se passe dans notre pays savait deja: que ca fait 2ans1/2 qu'ils (les Democrates) attendent ce jour! Elle ne s'en cache meme plus! et pourtant, ils n'ont pas ete fichus de mettre 1 seul crime dans les Articles!
Ils ont commence avec la Russie, manque de chance, les conclusions du rapport Mueller ne leur ont pas apporte ce qu'ils avaient promis de prouver pendant pres de 2 ans.. Trump selon eux, etait un agent russe, les elections avaient ete truquees par la Russie. etc.
Rien de tout ca..
Apres le rapport Horowitz d'il y a quelques jours, on sait que ce que 45 avait dit depuis le debut etait reel, que tout etait un coup monte et que pour le detruire tout avait ete utilise, mensonges, fausses documentations soumises pour obtention de divers mandats de surveillance etc..
Alors, ils sont passes a l'Ukraine, avec cette conversation telephonique du mois de Juillet entre 45 et le nouveau president. Un denonciateur/denonciatrice
disant avoir entendu quelque chose d'inacceptable, une traitrise, se sentait oblige de parler...
45 a donc rendu publique le contenu de la conversation en question, et depuis, les mots sont changes (de: nous en moi) afin de rendre la destitution de Trump plus acceptable.
On a le droit de se demander si on est bien aux Etats Unis.
Rep. Jeff Van Drew, D-N.J., met with President Trump on Friday to discuss going across party lines and joining the Republican Party -- this after he has spent months criticizing fellow Democrats for their push to impeach Trump.
A source confirmed to Fox News on Saturday that Van Drew met with Trump to discuss switching parties.
Another source told Fox News that Van Drew may be seeking a Rose Garden ceremony if he were to switch. Van Drew is one of two Democrats who opposed the resolution codifying the impeachment probe. In addition, Van Drew indicated last week he would not support impeachment and thought impeachment would backfire on Democrats.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, called the party switch "cynical and desperate."
"Jeff Van Drew has chosen his political career over our Constitution," Murphy said in a statement Friday night. "Despite knowing full well that the president has abused the powers of his office, Congressman Van Drew is now willing to enable Donald Trump just to try to salvage his own election."
He added: "Betraying our values by siding with Donald Trump is the final straw and made it impossible for him to continue being supported by our party, as grassroots activists, local party leaders in his district, and I have made clear in recent weeks."
The Washington Post first reported that Trump had personally urged Van Drew to jump ship and that the lawmaker strongly considering it. The New York Times reported that he could make an announcement as soon as next week, just as the House gears up to vote on impeachment.
A spokesperson for Van Drew did not immediately return a request for comment. Two Democratic aides told Fox News that they expected Van Drew to switch parties.
While Van Drew has called President Trump’s conduct in relation to his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky “unsavory,” he has repeatedly said he did not see evidence that would justify his removal from office. He was one of just two House Democrats to oppose the House’s November vote to set impeachment rules.
In an interview with Fox Business last month, he said he would vote against articles of impeachment unless he hears evidence against President Trump that "rises to the level of treason or a high crime."
He said the "Founding Fathers had vigorous debates of whether they would even allow impeachment in the Constitution," and that he favors allowing voters to decide the matter in next year's election.
"You don't disenfranchise voters, millions upon millions of voters. Voters choose their leaders in America," Van Drew had said.
The Times reported that during conversations between Van Drew and Trump advisers, where the freshman congressman said he was nervous about losing his seat either in a Democratic primary -- due to his opposition to impeachment in a liberal state -- or in a general election. A Democratic aide told Fox News that a recent poll his campaign took showed another Democrat would beat him in a primary race.
The Times reported that while Van Drew has not yet made a final decision, he was serious enough that he discussed what day to make an announcement and whether to do it before the upcoming vote on articles of impeachment.
The meeting came the same day that the House Judiciary Committee voted to adopt two articles of impeachment in a party-line vote. The article allege abuse of power and obstruction by Trump. Should the House adopt the articles next week, it could trigger a Senate trial in the new year just as 2020 presidential primaries are about to get underway.
"Today is a solemn and sad day,"* Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., told reporters after the vote. "For the third time in a little over a century and a half, the House Judiciary Committee has voted articles of impeachment against the president -- for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The House will act expeditiously."
*
Nancy confirmait recemment ce que tout Americain qui suit ce qui se passe dans notre pays savait deja: que ca fait 2ans1/2 qu'ils (les Democrates) attendent ce jour! Elle ne s'en cache meme plus! et pourtant, ils n'ont pas ete fichus de mettre 1 seul crime dans les Articles! Ils ont commence avec la Russie, manque de chance, les conclusions du rapport Mueller ne leur ont pas apporte ce qu'ils avaient promis de prouver pendant pres de 2 ans.. Trump selon eux, etait un agent russe, les elections avaient ete truquees par la Russie. etc.
Rien de tout ca..
Apres le rapport Horowitz d'il y a quelques jours, on sait que ce que 45 avait dit depuis le debut etait reel, que tout etait un coup monte et que pour le detruire tout avait ete utilise, mensonges, fausses documentations soumises pour obtention de divers mandats de surveillance etc..
Alors, ils sont passes a l'Ukraine, avec cette conversation telephonique du mois de Juillet entre 45 et le nouveau president. Un denonciateur/denonciatrice
disant avoir entendu quelque chose d'inacceptable, une traitrise, se sentait oblige de parler... 45 a donc rendu publique le contenu de la conversation en question, et depuis, les mots sont changes (de: nous en moi) afin de rendre la destitution de Trump plus acceptable.
On a le droit de se demander si on est bien aux Etats Unis.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Dim 15 Déc - 13:28
une semaine "a la" Trump!
- Senate confirmation of 50th Federal Appeals Court Judge
- Government shut Passage of the National down set to be averted
- Passade of the National Defense Bill
- Anti-semitism Executive Order
- Phase 1 of the Trade Deal with China
- USMCA moving forward (Nancy evidemment tire les convertures a elle 1heure apres l'annonce officiel d l'impeachment.. elle peut "marcher et macher du chewing gum"... L'accord entre 45 et le Canada avait ete conclu il y a presqu'1 an).
Cote Democrate
- Impeachment of the president with 2 articles: abuse of power*1 and obstruction of Congress*2.
Pas un seul crime comme preuve.
Les Democrates, le parti des intelligents n'apprennent jamais de leurs erreurs. (Reid et sa "nuclear option"..). Ils ont pour habitude de changer les regles du jeu pour imposer leurs vues. Le probleme, pour eux, est qu'ils ne sont pas toujours au pouvoir.
Ca ne les a pas genes:
*1 lorsque Clinton a passe un "accord" avec Boris (pas Johnson hein)
*2 Obama/Holder pendant Fast and Furious..
- Senate confirmation of 50th Federal Appeals Court Judge
- Government shut Passage of the National down set to be averted
- Passade of the National Defense Bill
- Anti-semitism Executive Order
- Phase 1 of the Trade Deal with China
- USMCA moving forward (Nancy evidemment tire les convertures a elle 1heure apres l'annonce officiel d l'impeachment.. elle peut "marcher et macher du chewing gum"...
L'accord entre 45 et le Canada avait ete conclu il y a presqu'1 an).Cote Democrate
- Impeachment of the president with 2 articles: abuse of power*1 and obstruction of Congress*2.
Pas un seul crime comme preuve.
Les Democrates, le parti des intelligents
n'apprennent jamais de leurs erreurs. (Reid et sa "nuclear option"..). Ils ont pour habitude de changer les regles du jeu pour imposer leurs vues. Le probleme, pour eux, est qu'ils ne sont pas toujours au pouvoir.Ca ne les a pas genes:
*1 lorsque Clinton a passe un "accord" avec Boris (pas Johnson hein
)*2 Obama/Holder pendant Fast and Furious..
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Dim 15 Déc - 13:38
Aie j'ai failli oublier!! Les chiffres du mois de novembre:
Jobs growth soars in November as payrolls surge by 266,000 (Jeff Cox - CNBC)
KEY POINTS
On comprend le besoin pour les Democrates de le destituer pour eviter qu'il ne soit reelu!
Les chiffres du mois de novembre:Jobs growth soars in November as payrolls surge by 266,000 (Jeff Cox - CNBC)
KEY POINTS
- Nonfarm payrolls surged by 266,000 in November, better than the 187,000 expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.
- The unemployment rate ticked down to 3.5% from 3.6%, back to the 2019 low and matching the lowest jobless rate since 1969.
- The end of the GM strike had a big effect, boosting employment in motor vehicles and parts by 41,300, part of an overall 54,000 gain in manufacturing.
- Average hourly earnings rose by 3.1% from a year ago, slightly above the 3% expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.
- Dow: 28,135.38 +3.33 (0.012%) Dec 13, 5:14 PM EST · Disclaimer
On comprend le besoin pour les Democrates de le destituer pour eviter qu'il ne soit reelu!
- EddieCochran+
- Messages : 7134
Date d'inscription : 15/10/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Dim 15 Déc - 23:53
687 -
Ce sont là, Chère Sylvette, de belles performances macroéconomiques pour les E-U. Bravo. Certains commentateurs ici laissent entendre que ces bons résultats ne seraient pas nécessairement imputables à la gouvernance du Donut. Des jaloux peut-être ?
Ce sont là, Chère Sylvette, de belles performances macroéconomiques pour les E-U. Bravo. Certains commentateurs ici laissent entendre que ces bons résultats ne seraient pas nécessairement imputables à la gouvernance du Donut. Des jaloux peut-être ?
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Lun 16 Déc - 4:39
Noonn, vous pensez, Eddie??
Une chose est a peu pres certaine, si l'economie avait pris une mauvaise direction, ca n'aurait pas ete la consequence de la politique economique de 44 mais bien la faute de 45, uniquement!! Mais, je peux me tromper..
Une chose est a peu pres certaine, si l'economie avait pris une mauvaise direction, ca n'aurait pas ete la consequence de la politique economique de 44 mais bien la faute de 45, uniquement!! Mais, je peux me tromper..
- EddieCochran+
- Messages : 7134
Date d'inscription : 15/10/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Lun 16 Déc - 14:49
689 -
Sur nos plateaux télé, j'ai entendu des esperts en économie connaissant les E-U espliquer que les bons résultats sont sur la lancée des mesures prises sous l'ère à 44 fillette.
Sur nos plateaux télé, j'ai entendu des esperts en économie connaissant les E-U espliquer que les bons résultats sont sur la lancée des mesures prises sous l'ère à 44 fillette.
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mar 17 Déc - 14:55
Eddie:
je prendrais en particulier l'exemple de NAFTA, annule, renegocie et remplace par le USMCA (pending final signature).
Que dire de l'OTAN, du premier pas fait avec un accord avec la Chine etc... etc..
Ah ca y est de 18 mille et des poussieres, le DOW est passe a 28 mille et des poussieres, 10,000 points et ce serait grace a 44?? N'oublions pas le bond en avant fait le lendemain des elections en 2016 et meme avec cette ridicule histoire d'impeachment..
Quand l'economie n'arrivait pas a redecoller c'etait la fote a 43, maintenant que l'economie est la meilleure depuis plus de 60 ans, c'est grace a lui.
Le vote "africain-americain" est primordial pour les Democrates, s'ils font comme les fameux "petits chats socialistes" de la blague et ouvrent leurs yeux, ca risque d'etre un gros probleme pour la gauche. (N'oublions pas que le taux de chomage pour eux, pour les hispaniques est le plus bas jamais enregistre)
je prendrais en particulier l'exemple de NAFTA, annule, renegocie et remplace par le USMCA (pending final signature).Que dire de l'OTAN, du premier pas fait avec un accord avec la Chine etc... etc..
Ah ca y est de 18 mille et des poussieres, le DOW est passe a 28 mille et des poussieres, 10,000 points et ce serait grace a 44?? N'oublions pas le bond en avant fait le lendemain des elections en 2016 et meme avec cette ridicule histoire d'impeachment..
Quand l'economie n'arrivait pas a redecoller c'etait la fote a 43, maintenant que l'economie est la meilleure depuis plus de 60 ans, c'est grace a lui.
Le vote "africain-americain" est primordial pour les Democrates, s'ils font comme les fameux "petits chats socialistes" de la blague et ouvrent leurs yeux, ca risque d'etre un gros probleme pour la gauche. (N'oublions pas que le taux de chomage pour eux, pour les hispaniques est le plus bas jamais enregistre)
Rumba- Messages : 3135
Date d'inscription : 28/10/2017
Localisation : ça dépend :)
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mar 17 Déc - 17:47
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 18 Déc - 7:44
Secret FISA court issues highly unusual public rebuke of FBI for mistakes The criticism comes after a report by the DOJ inspector general that found "so many basic and fundamental errors."
Suite a ces "erreurs" 45 a subi plus de 2 annees d'insultes, de mensonges, de menaces etc.. et a un rapport qui n'a finalement absolument rien prouve contre lui et coute plus de 32 millions de dollars aux Americains. Ces erreurs ne peuvent etre que 1) volontaires, 2) un manque total de professionnalisme ou 3) un exemple desastreux de manque de capacites professionnelles. Horowitz (Inspecteur General du Departement de Justice, auteur/responsable du rapport FBI dernierement rendu publique, s'il a dit qu'il ne sagissait pas de biais politique de la part des responsables des applications de demandes en particulier, a fini par admettre qu'il disait cela parce qu'il n'avait pas pu prouver que c'etait le cas. (meme avec les fameux emails Stotz/Page, ces deux personnages, selon lui n'avait pas eu un role important meme s'ils avaient ete presents lors de reunions decidant de l'ouverture du fameux dossier contre la campagne de 45).
Suite a ces "erreurs" 45 a subi plus de 2 annees d'insultes, de mensonges, de menaces etc.. et a un rapport qui n'a finalement absolument rien prouve contre lui et coute plus de 32 millions de dollars aux Americains. Ces erreurs ne peuvent etre que 1) volontaires, 2) un manque total de professionnalisme ou 3) un exemple desastreux de manque de capacites professionnelles. Horowitz (Inspecteur General du Departement de Justice, auteur/responsable du rapport FBI dernierement rendu publique, s'il a dit qu'il ne sagissait pas de biais politique de la part des responsables des applications de demandes en particulier, a fini par admettre qu'il disait cela parce qu'il n'avait pas pu prouver que c'etait le cas. (meme avec les fameux emails Stotz/Page, ces deux personnages, selon lui n'avait pas eu un role important meme s'ils avaient ete presents lors de reunions decidant de l'ouverture du fameux dossier contre la campagne de 45).
- Rumba
- Messages : 3135
Date d'inscription : 28/10/2017
Localisation : ça dépend :)
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 18 Déc - 8:58
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Procédure de destitution : Donald Trump face à un vote historique au Congrès
Procédure de destitution : Donald Trump face à un vote historique au Congrès
La chambre des Représentants votera, ce mercredi 18 décembre, l'impeachment contre Donald Trump. Toutefois, une destitution a peu de chances d'aboutir, le Sénat restant majoritairement républicain.
Kalawasa- Messages : 6064
Date d'inscription : 15/10/2017
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 18 Déc - 11:55
Bill Clinton est aussi passé par là, et ...? Sa popularité a augmenté, me semble-t-il...
- InvitéInvité
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 18 Déc - 12:31
oui, Kalawasa, c'est exact.., nous verrons, (j'espere bien, mais nous verrons).
hubert.de.boisredon- Messages : 5036
Date d'inscription : 03/01/2019
Localisation : lyon
Re: Nouvelles en langue anglaise
Mer 18 Déc - 12:54
morbleu
bonjour à tous et à sylvette
le sujet de l'impeachment m'intéresse peu, mais, de mon point de vue, et eu égard au contexte ricain actuel, Trump ne risque rien, même si c'est pas "classe", ce qui s'est passé, sans épiloguer !
il n'a pas été élu par hasard, et les states, d'un point de vue économique, sont quasiment, ou presque, sur un nuage, depuis son arrivée aux manettes !
je n'aime pas trop le bonhomme, c'est vrai, son côté fanfaron parfois limite grotesque, mais il assume et assure, les résultats l'attestent, il se situe aux antipodes de notre caricature francaouie, dont il vaut mieux éviter de parler-écrit céans !
et bon vent aux ricains, et santé !
également
hub'
bonjour à tous et à sylvette
le sujet de l'impeachment m'intéresse peu, mais, de mon point de vue, et eu égard au contexte ricain actuel, Trump ne risque rien, même si c'est pas "classe", ce qui s'est passé, sans épiloguer !
il n'a pas été élu par hasard, et les states, d'un point de vue économique, sont quasiment, ou presque, sur un nuage, depuis son arrivée aux manettes !
je n'aime pas trop le bonhomme, c'est vrai, son côté fanfaron parfois limite grotesque, mais il assume et assure, les résultats l'attestent, il se situe aux antipodes de notre caricature francaouie, dont il vaut mieux éviter de parler-écrit céans !
et bon vent aux ricains, et santé !
également
hub'
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum|
|
|